Overunity Details of J.I.M.S. Motor Reluctantly Revealed
BB Motor Corporation has reluctantly answered some questions about an exotic motor they have
built that is claimed to be able to run without fuel and produce no pollution. A
breakthrough energy technology may be about to emerge from the state of Texas.
by Hank Mills
Pure Energy Systems News
Not every company working on free energy technology likes publicity.
Many companies doing cutting edge research and development desire to
keep a low profile. This can be for many reasons, such as remaining
under the radar from competitors, not revealing the existence of their
technology to the powers that be, or even just the ability to work in
peace -- free of disruptions from other parties.
BB Motor Corp, Inc. is such a company, and did not appreciate the fact we ran an article about them titled,
"BB Motor Corp's Fuelless
J.I.M.S. Engine." In fact, they were so displeased about the
fact we let their existence be known (despite the fact they have a
public website), the co-founder and CEO of BB Motor Corp, Robert H.
Smith, stated we may be hearing from their legal team. However, despite
his irritation with the article we published, he graciously answered
Sterling Allan's questions about their company and technology; and he
agreed to do a recorded
interview today (which we will report on in a follow-up story).
Let's review the basic facts about BB Motor Corporation. The company is
based in Southlake, Texas, and claims to have an exotic engine they have
named "J.I.M.S" which stands for, "Jesus Is My Savior." The engine was
invented by an individual named, "Rhett." He came up with the idea for
engine not long after his son was killed in a roadside bombing in Iraq.
Certain elements of the engine's logo honor the countless soldiers that
have given their lives to preserve freedom. Other elements represent the
company's dedication to producing "green" technology that is
environmentally friendly.
Until the CEO of the company recently answered several questions, only a
modest amount information was available about their engine. Their
company website -- already on the internet for everyone to see -- did
provide a few facts that seemed to indicate the engine was
revolutionary, and potentially overunity. For example, the engine was
described as not burning fuel, being capable of eliminating energy
costs, and allowing independence from foreign oil. It is also stated
that the engine could allow for a reduction in pollution (due to the
fact it does not emit any), and "a cleaner and more prosperous America."
The engine is also claimed to be composed of only five moving parts,
have an estimated lifespan of 1,000,000 miles due to the small amount of
wear produced by the few moving parts, and be estimated as being
capable of producing over 100,000 foot pounds of torque. It is also
designed to run at 50 to 700 RPMs, unlike typical V8 engines that can
operate at an RPM of 4,000 or higher. This is a good thing, because by
producing a greater torque at a lower speed, you can avoid extra wear
and tear due to friction produced at high speeds.
When responding to Sterling Allan's questions, the CEO provided
additional information about the company and technology. In regards to
how the world will react to the engine, they think it is probable they
will make as many enemies as allies. Their technology is alleged to be
so revolutionary that it will have a huge domestic and global demand.
According to their research, there is no other technology like theirs.
In response to questions about how the technology works and what data
has been obtained, the CEO provided a few very interesting bits of
information. Basically, the technology is claimed to work in a very
interesting way. An electric motor produces hundreds of pounds of
hydraulic pressure that is fed into the engine. A "hydraulic multiplier"
effect then takes place inside the engine that apparently creates extra
energy via a mechanism that remains undisclosed for proprietary
reasons. The mechanical output power of the engine is then greater than
the electrical energy that was used to power the electric motor.
Although it is not specified, I think a portion of the mechanical output
power must be converted into electricity, and used to power the
electric motor. This would "close the loop" so to speak, or allow the
system to self-sustain. Basically, here is a simple diagram of how it
seems the technology would work in a self sustained mode of operation.
First Electric Motor --> Hydraulic Pressure --> Engine
With Hydraulic Multiplier --> Torque --> Generator -->
Electrical Power --> First Electric Motor
Here are the answers that the CEO, Robert Smith, provided Sterling Allan.
|
Q: How does the technology work (overview)?
A: Very Proprietary and not to be made public at this time. In
basics, it converts electric power to kinetic power and back to electric
at a substantial surplus due to a hydraulic multiplier. (that is
probably more info than my atty's would like me to give).
Q: Where are you in the process of implementing it commercially?
A: We are unfortunately still in r&d and hoping to launch a
platform of corporate level r&d relationships later this year. The
generator aspect is not going on hold but we do not intend to be selfish
with the technology and have an enormous amount of major corporations
wanting to "get close" to the motor.
Q: What kind of data have you accumulated?
A: We have accumulated data that more than supports our claims of
what we will be able to do. In reality it appears that what the
engineers thought it would take was about 2-3 times what it is actually
taking. It has been said by many that have seen the motor "It is a
beast!!". Will I tell you the data? No. I will say that we generated
1000+ lbs of torque with 300psi of hydraulic pressure from a 1 hp
electric motor. That should be enough to confuse you. And that was using
only 2 of 8 cylinders.
Q: Independently tested?
A: Not yet. We have plans to take it to San Antonio for "heavy
testing" on a dyno that will go up to 30k lbs of torque as long as we
guarantee not to break their dyno! lol.
Q: What price point do you expect to start out at in terms of cents/kw-h?
A: Hard to answer today, at a point we are closer to releasing it
to the public that will be more appropriate, I will say that it will be
quite affordable and current numbers show a 3 year time for return of
100% cost to consumer. We hope those numbers don't change.
Q: How much might this price change in the next 5 years?
A: Impossible to tell, do you have an inflation gauge?
Q:How does your technology compare to others like it out there?
A:There is no other technology like that that we are aware of and if there is we have not researched it.
Q: What are its strengths?
A: I think the strengths are obvious.
Q: Weaknesses?
A: None that we are aware of currently.
Q: How might someone invest in the company?
A: By contacting me at bob@bbmotorcorp.com. They must be a
"qualified investor" and pass our atty team "sniff test". Potential
investors must we willing to come see the motor/company in person. We
are only interested in investors that share the "total" vision of our
company. This is not all about money, we for whatever reason, have been
given the task of this motor. I don't know why, but it is what it is.
Few people are given the opportunity to leave the world a better place
than it was when they came in. There are a lot of things in the world
that this motor can do, we will see how many of them we can have an
impact with. |
Massive Overunity in Texas
Perhaps one of the most interesting details he gave, was the fact that
in one test, the system used a one horsepower electric motor to produce
the hydraulic input for the engine. He claims from that one horsepower
of input, the system produced 1,000 foot pounds of torque. By
themselves, these two numbers would not reveal the potential COP
(Coefficient of Performance) of the system, or an idea of how much
"overunity" it can produce. However, the company website gives figures
for the RPM range the engine is designed to operate in.
"V-8 engines run at an average rpm range of 800 to 4000 and the J.I.M.S. engine is designed to run at 50 to 700 rpms."
On the same page, their website states...
"The horsepower and torque will vary, based on the actual PSI and gallons per minute that are used to drive the motor."
Let's be very conservative, and guess the engine was running at 50RPMs.
We could use a higher speed, but then the required input power to
provide the needed hydraulic pressure may be increased (which could
really muck up the calculation). To calculate horsepower (which will
tell us the watts out), we must use the equation: horsepower equals
torque times force (in foot pounds), divided by 5252. So we have one
thousand foot pounds of torque multiplied by fifty RPMs, divided by
5252. This results in 9.52 units of horsepower produced by the engine,
compared to the 1 horsepower of input. If this mechanical output could
be converted into electricity without any losses the input/output ratio
would be approximately 745 watts in, and 7,099 watts out. This is a COP
of almost 10, which is fantastic.
Of course the above is a rough estimate, and the potential output of the
system could be much higher. For example, if the RPM was really 700RPM
(the maximum the system is designed for), the COP could go through the
roof to 133 or higher. If the torque was increased beyond 1,000 foot
pounds, which is claimed to be possible by the company, the amount of
power this system could produce would be phenomenal. One final aspect to
note is that to produce the above huge output, it is alleged to have
only been using two out of eight cylinders.
If you want to run the numbers yourself, a good calculator is, here.
This technology is screaming for third party testing, which the company
is planning on having done in San Antonio, Texas. The planned date for
the testing was not disclosed. If a third party can successfully
validate this technology, I think it would be fit to go on our top five
technology list -- alongside the E-Cat and PlasmERG engine.
If I had to guess about the fundamental mechanism the engine uses to
allegedly produce such a huge amount of output, I would guess
centrifugal force was being harnessed. Unlike what many people think,
centrifugal force can be harnessed and used to produce work, and free
energy.
Regardless how the J.I.M.S engine works on a fundamental level, it needs
to be tested by a third party, ASAP. If validated, this technology
could be used to allow our world to become a better place. It could
literally end the energy crisis, reduce the amount of pollution released
into the environment, and restore the economies of the world. There are
so many benefits of this technology, it could take an entire article to
list them all.
|
